Measured, not claimed
A legal answer you can check.
Any assistant can write confident Indian law. The question is whether you can check it. Juristo shows the statute it read, the judgment it relied on, and the reviewed template a document was drafted from — each one a link you can open before you sign anything.
Every draft shows its working.
This is the part no accuracy score captures. Ask a general assistant for a shareholders agreement and you get one — with no way to know what it was built from. Juristo names the instrument, its assurance tier and the date the law behind it was checked, and links you to it.
Where a draft comes from
Reviewed instruments Juristo drafts against · not a comparison
- 1 Juristo verified
- Freshness-approved against official sources, with a recorded law-as-of date.
- 10 Lawyer vetted
- Drafted or reviewed by a practising advocate and published as a complete instrument.
11 document types covered
- Cloud services
- Commercial lease
- Employee NDA
- Employment agreement
- Founders agreement
- IT vendor agreement
- Master services
- Mutual NDA
- Residential rental
- Shareholders agreement
- Software maintenance
Ask for something outside these and Juristo still writes it — on its own drafting profile, and the document says so rather than implying a reviewed template stood behind it.
The draft names its template
Title, assurance tier, jurisdiction, version and the law-as-of date it was approved against — on the document card, not buried in a log.
And why that one was chosen
The match reason is shown, so you can see it was an exact match on document type and jurisdiction rather than a guess.
Every authority resolves
Statutes and judgments relied on are listed with their publisher and a link that opens the source.
Against the general assistants.
The same Indian law questions, put to each system and checked the same way. Two of the checks are deterministic — no model decides the result, so anyone can re-run them.
The head-to-head run published here is too small to report as rates.
Each check — quoted repealed law, invented a party in a draft — engaged only a handful of the published questions, and a share of a handful is not a finding. The counts stay out of this page until a run large enough to carry them has been reviewed.
11 questions · 2026-08-19
Some of it isn’t a score.
These aren’t areas where the general assistants do worse. They are things a chat window does not do at all.
Citations are checked before you see them
A case name we could not verify does not appear in the answer at all.
Statute read now, not remembered
Thresholds, limitation periods and filing routes come from official sources fetched while answering.
A document, not a description of one
Drafts arrive as saved, versioned files you can revise in place.
The work carries on past the answer
ODR packets, filing routes, and handoff to a vetted advocate — with the matter file intact.
Ask it the question you were about to ask a general assistant.
Then check what each one cited. That is the whole argument.